tigertoy: (Default)
[personal profile] tigertoy
From a release on NVidia's web site, that I clicked through from a news page:
"The Tesla GPU features 128 parallel processors, and delivers up to 518 gigaflops of parallel computation."

Unless I'm misreading something, that's half a teraflop on a single chip.

I'm in the middle of Charles Stross' Accelerando. The things he projects about the amount of computing power available seem less far fetched today than they did yesterday somehow.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-06-22 03:28 am (UTC)
erik: A Chibi-style cartoon of me! (Default)
From: [personal profile] erik
Yes. But it's a very focused half a teraflop; It's a GPU, designed to quickly do graphics...from the press release I'm not clear if this power will be available to the general hardware for doing other things.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-06-22 03:34 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tigertoy.livejournal.com
The press release clearly states that it's being marketed for scientific calculation, rather than for graphics, and asserts that they provide software support for generalized supercomuter use.

Time will tell, but if it's a real product, I might be playing with one myself -- I work in a lab that develops geochemistry software, one of the areas they specifically mention as an application.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-06-22 04:31 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] daev.livejournal.com
I always wonder whether people who talk about massive-scale ubiquitous computing ("a million Crays sewn into your clothes!") have ever been in a server room when the air conditioning fails.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-06-22 05:04 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tigertoy.livejournal.com
That's something I'd never really thought of. Just this week, I was discussing a serious proposal to build a supercomputer here at the U of I that would suck down a meaningful percentage of the total capacity of Abbot.

Better technology can certainly increase the MIPS/watt ratio by a few orders of magnitude, but when you're talking about increasing the MIPS by more than a few orders of magnitude, you're talking about a great deal of power and waste heat.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-06-23 12:36 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] beige-alert.livejournal.com
There is finally some attention getting paid to that. Partly as people realize just how big the power bills are, and partly just from the practical challenges of forcing enough air through a room filled with racks that use tens of kilowatts each. Back in Cray days the CPU used 150+ kW but was directly liquid cooled. People are doing serious computational fluid dynamics studies of airflow in machine rooms.

The CPUs themselves run mighty hot, but lots of power gets wasted elsewhere. 30% efficient power supplies and zillions of tiny little inefficient fans in everything, and the chiller is cooling the air while a steam boiler is used to humidify.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-06-23 12:21 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] shockwave77598.livejournal.com
Now THAT is computing power. *drools*

Profile

tigertoy: (Default)
tigertoy

January 2026

S M T W T F S
    12 3
45 678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags